A study aims to determine whether there are disparities in burden and treatment across neighborhoods, and if socioeconomic position, race, ethnicity have an impact.
Statistics show that 116 million adults in the United States have hypertension, also known as high blood pressure. There are various modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease—smoking, diabetes, high cholesterol, obesity, physical inactivity, and poor nutrition to name a few—but hypertension is considered the top one.1,2
Also, hypertension in middle-aged adults (those 35-50 years of age) is reportedly associated with “poor cardiovascular health in subsequent decades. ”.3 As a result, in a cross-sectional study published in JAMA Network Open,1 investigators sought to figure out and understand how hypertension differs by race and ethnicity across various levels of neighborhood socioeconomic position.
Between the Aug. 7, 2023, and June 1, 2024 timeframe, the investigators examined electronic health record (EHR) data of adults aged 35 to 50 years who lived in Cuyahoga County, OH, and had one or more primary care appointments within the Cleveland Clinic Health System or MetroHealth System in the year 2019. Geocoded EHR data were then linked to the area deprivation index (ADI), which is a neighborhood disadvantage measure, at the US Census Block Group level (such as by neighborhood).
The total sample size consisted of 56,387 adults (median [IQR] age, 43.1 [39.1-46.9] years; 59.8% female) spanning 1,157 neighborhoods. Overall, this included 3.4% Asian, 5.5% Hispanic, 31.1% Black, and 60.0% White patients being evaluated. The study authors observed a gradient of hypertension prevalence, consisting of the highest versus lowest ADI quintile neighborhoods having a higher hypertension rate (50.7% vs 25.5%) and a lower treatment rate (61.3% vs 64.5%).
Out of the 315 neighborhoods containing mostly Black (>75%) patient populations, 200 (63%) had a hypertension rate greater than 35% combined with a treatment rate of less than 70%; this means that 31 of 263 neighborhoods (11.8%) making up 5% or less Black patient populations met this same benchmark. When compared alongside a spatial model without covariates, inclusion of ADI and proportion of Black patients comprised 91% of variation in hypertension diagnosis prevalence among men, and 98% among women. Men therefore presented a greater prevalence of hypertension than women across race and ADI quintiles, but the association of ADI and hypertension risk was stronger in women. Sex prevalence differences were smallest between Black men and women, particularly in the highest ADI quintile (1689 [60.0%] and 2592 [56.0%], respectively).
However, it’s important to note that the study does present various limitations, including that the population is only limited to patients who actually engage with the healthcare system and utilize the primary care services. This means that the above hypertension estimates only represents the people who accessed care.
Given these results, the investigators concluded that, “The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest stark racial and neighborhood disparities in hypertension prevalence and antihypertensive treatment among adults in midlife, with a significant burden of undertreated hypertension in socioeconomically disadvantaged and racially segregated communities. Using spatial analysis techniques to identify neighborhoods in need, future research might investigate structural interventions to address place-based hypertension disparities.”
References
1. Blazel MM, Perzynski AT, Gunsalus PR, et al. Neighborhood-Level Disparities in Hypertension Prevalence and Treatment Among Middle-Aged Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(8):e2429764. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29764
2. Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors. Illinois Department of Public Health. Accessed September 11, 2024. http://www.idph.state.il.us/heartstroke/cvd_rf.htm#:~:text=The%20more%20risk%20factors%20a,physical%20inactivity%20and%20poor%20nutrition.
3. Liu EF, Rubinsky AD, Pacca L, et al. Examining neighborhood socioeconomic status as a mediator of racial/ethnic disparities in hypertension control across two San Francisco health systems. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022;15(2):e008256. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008256
LogiPharma Unpacked: Highlights, Key Insights, and the Road to 2025
October 16th 2024In this special post-show episode, we sit down with Ryan Portela, Head of Production for LogiPharma, to reflect on the highlights and key takeaways from this year’s event. From attendee feedback to the most impactful sessions, Ryan shares insider insights and discusses how the momentum from 2024 will continue to shape the future of pharma supply chains. Plus, get a sneak peek into the exciting plans for LogiPharma's 20th Anniversary in 2025.
Reimagining Closed-Loop Marketing Strategies for Pharma Companies
November 21st 2024The pharmaceutical industry is evolving, and so are the strategies needed to connect with healthcare professionals. Closed-loop marketing (CLM) has become essential in delivering personalized, data-driven engagement that resonates with physicians and improves key outcomes, such as enhancing patient care, increasing
Maximize Pharma’s Potential with AI-Ready Data for Commercial Excellence
November 21st 2024As the pharmaceutical industry embraces the power of AI, having data that’s large, diverse, and well-structured is critical for driving innovation and improving outcomes. Ensuring your data is AI-ready and can be used with more advanced solutions enables your teams to make informed strategic decisions, predict trends, enhance customer engagements and drive overall strategy.