Digital transformation initiatives are often complex endeavors that can significantly impact the way organizations operate.
Beneath the surface of the digital transformation revolution lies a growing concern: digital transformation fatigue. This phenomenon, particularly in highly regulated industries, threatens to undermine the very initiatives designed to propel businesses forward.
As companies grapple with a constantly expanding array of digital tools, stringent regulatory requirements, and a constant pressure to innovate, they find themselves at a critical juncture. How can they overcome the complexities of digital transformation while avoiding the pitfalls of employee burnout and resistance to change?
It is no wonder businesses are prioritizing digital transformation, as it promises increased efficiency, productivity, and profitability. However, digital transformation initiatives are often complex endeavors that can significantly impact the way organizations operate. This complexity gives rise to a new phenomenon known as digital transformation fatigue.
So, what exactly is digital transformation fatigue? According to KPMG, this growing trend has its roots in constant modernizing initiatives, often with competing timelines and priorities. In short, companies face unprecedented technological change, which is reflected in employees' workloads, leading to frustration. What’s more, digital transformation fatigue affects productivity and therefore negatively impacts profitability and return on investment.
Indeed, the sheer volume of software applications used across an organization has surged due to the rapid adoption of new technologies. According to a 2023 Salesforce survey of IT leaders, companies now use an average of 1,061 different applications, a 10% increase from the 976 recorded in 2022. This relentless pace of change leaves employees with little time to adapt, contributing to cognitive overload and low productivity.
When employees are overwhelmed and resistant to change, transformation initiatives fail to deliver the anticipated benefits. Estimates from McKinsey show that up to 70% of digital transformation efforts do not meet their intended goals, which implies a large potential for waste.
These setbacks drain resources and hinder organizations from achieving the competitive advantages they seek through innovation. And innovation is a central topic for companies in highly regulated industries, which are looking for ways to drive growth while dealing with increasingly strict regulatory requirements.
Highly regulated industries often modernize at a glacial pace, and face particularly unique hurdles in their digital transformation journeys. These sectors, as we know, must manage stringent regulatory requirements, which often create a very careful and tentative approach to the implementation of new technologies.
In many enterprises, legacy systems are so deeply entrenched in daily operations that it proves a significant challenge to attempt to replace or integrate them with more modern solutions. To add to the hesitancy, heightened concerns about data security and privacy are complicating the adoption of these cloud-based and AI-driven technologies, which are often at the forefront of digital transformation efforts.
It’s the high stakes of non-compliance in these industries that fosters such a conservative approach to change. Not only that, but traditional organizational cultures within sectors such as pharma and financial services often differ to the agile, “fail-fast” approach demanded by digital transformation.
The culmination of these challenges can easily lead to digital transformation fatigue. Projects become prolonged and complex, putting a strain on resources and morale.
Frequent adaptation to regulatory updates such as the multiyear implementation of IDMP within the pharmaceutical industry, means constant revisions to strategies. And, with such high implementation costs for new systems, the return on investment for these transformation efforts may be delayed or difficult to measure.
Quite simply, it can feel like “fatigue-by-a-thousand-cuts,” as the cumulative effect of these factors creates an environment ripe for change fatigue. So how can highly regulated organizations ensure digital transformation initiatives are not only successful, but also avoid the detrimental impact of change fatigue on both the business and its employees?
Complexity is the enemy of sustainable transformation. For regulated industries, in which compliance requirements add layers of intricacy to every process, simplification is not just beneficial, but essential.
By streamlining complex business processes, companies can reduce the load on their workforce, allowing employees to focus on value-adding tasks rather than getting bogged down in over-complicated workflows.
An effort to streamline extends beyond just process optimization, it requires a holistic view of how data and content are managed across the organization. In many industries, information silos and a network of disparate IT systems have long been the norm, slowly causing inefficiency and employee frustration.
A unified approach to data and content management breaks down these barriers, ensuring that information flows seamlessly across departments, and the organization as a whole. In a pharma company, this might look like the regulatory and clinical domains accessing the same data to compile a submission. In financial services, loan officers and underwriters simultaneously accessing updated customer financial data for faster approvals.
Streamlining business processes, data, and content in tandem creates an alignment that can dramatically reduce transformation fatigue. Employees no longer need to navigate multiple systems or reconcile conflicting information sources.
Instead, they can work within a single, unified system in which processes are intuitive, data is readily available, and content is managed and reused efficiently from a single source of truth. This unified strategy also enables a more gradual and coherent implementation of change; rather than overwhelming employees with a barrage of new systems and processes, organizations can roll out improvements in a more integrated and logical manner.
This approach helps prevent the sense of constant, disjointed change that often leads to fatigue and resistance. The benefits of this approach extend to most senior stakeholders within the organization too.
With streamlined and standardized processes, and centralized data and content, leadership gains a holistic picture of operations, enabling more informed decision-making. This transparency helps in demonstrating the tangible benefits of digital initiatives, maintaining stakeholder support and employee buy-in, both of which crucial factors in combating transformation fatigue.
Improved software adoption is a critical component of this unified strategy. Even the most well-designed processes and systems can fall short if employees struggle to use the tools provided.
By focusing on providing comprehensive and varied training, and offering ongoing support, organizations can ensure that their workforce is comfortable and proficient with new technologies.
This is where digital adoption solutions come in.
What is digital adoption? According to Forbes, digital adoption refers to achieving a state within your company where all of your digital tools and assets are leveraged to the fullest extent.
Successful digital adoption has become critical to digital transformation and change management strategies. It aims to maximize software investments, reduce the time wasted on maintaining underused applications, and enhance employee experience.
Enterprises in highly regulated industries face unique challenges in digital adoption due to their scale, diversity of tools, and variety of user roles and responsibilities. Without proper guidance, the risk of digital transformation fatigue rises again, which can then lead to decreased productivity, resistance to digital transformation initiatives, and a less than optimal return on investment (ROI) on software expenditures.
Undoubtedly, successful digital transformation hinges on the seamless integration of new digital tools with existing systems and processes. Effective digital adoption ensures that these tools complement and enhance workflows rather than disrupt them.
In addition, a higher level of digital adoption enables companies in highly regulated industries to remain responsive to changing regulatory demands. With the rapid pace of technological advancements and evolving regulations, organizations must be able to adapt quickly to maintain compliance and capitalize on new opportunities.
All in all, digital transformation and the unique context of highly regulated industries require a thoughtful approach to align technological advancements with strict compliance needs. Organizations that recognize the risk of digital transformation fatigue and prioritize digital adoption are better positioned to leverage technology for a competitive advantage, ultimately driving their initiatives toward successful outcomes.
About the Authors
Max Kelleher is Chief Executive Officer at Generis. Andrew Max started in Business Development, progressing to Head of European Sales, and then onto the COO position, before moving into the CEO role in early 2024. He is passionate about providing a viable, pragmatic path for modernizing enterprise information management in regulated industries. His close work with both pharma companies and specialist solution partners has afforded him deep insight into the critical modern-day challenges that traditional approaches to business processes and information use in complex industries like Life Sciences do not fulfill.
Hartmut Hahn is Userlane's Chief Executive Officer. Hartmut began his career as an analyst in Management Consulting & Ventures Investments, followed by a position as a Senior Management Consultant for the consulting firm Mücke, Sturm & Company. Before co-founding Userlane, Hartmut worked for Hubert Burda Media in Business & Corporate Development. In this role, Hartmut was responsible for corporate strategy and mergers and acquisitions. Hartmut holds two Master's degrees in Business Administration and Management from the University of Regensburg and Copenhagen Business School.